Wednesday 4 November 2015

Notes and Quotes: TBC

What are the underlying values and ideologies in drug related texts such as “Channel 4’s Run” and how does this compare to American texts on the same subject?”
What will this question answer?
·         Race and drugs
·         Social class and drugs
·         Health care system in the UK and America
·         America’s liberal views towards drugs vs. UK
·         How do American drug related texts illustrate them vs. UK

What other film texts will this essay cover?
UK drug related films – Run (Social Realistic), Skins (Teen Drama), TV Docs (2)
US drug related films – Miami Vice (Drama series), Requiem for a Dream (Drama), Wolf of Wall Street (Comedy), Scarface (Action) and Reefer Madness (Stoner Film)
____________________________________________________________________
Main Text: Run

Online Articles
-      Telegraph Article “Run, Channel Review” by Sameer Rahim, on July 15 2013
·         Last night’s Run (Channel 4), the first of four interlinked episodes that are being shown on successive evenings this week, was hardly sugar-coated, but such was the humanity of the writing and especially the performances that the characters felt compellingly real” – evidence to support the truth illustrated on screen, brutal approach to drug related themes
·         “This is the first show created by Daniel Fajemisin-Duncan and Marlon Smith – who grew up together in Brixton – and was clearly a labour of love. Channel 4 should be applauded for allowing them to realise their unsentimental vision.


-      UKTVREVIEWER Article “Run (Channel 4) Review” on July 16 2013
·         Everything about it was superbly gripping, featuring characters which we got to know instantly

-      Telegraph Article “Lennie James: I said yes before I’d even read the script” by Richard Vine on July 15 2013


·         Lennie James: “A drug addict who’s trying to work his way back from pretty much as low down as is humanly possible; he’s homeless, he’s separated from most of his family, his child, his mum.” – when James was nine he lost his mum and didn’t know who his father was, he was able to thus apply a sense of loss to his role as a drug addict where drugs had forced his family to neglect him.
·         James described the illustration of the production as a city where “life gets decided in the maybes”.
·         Directors, Daniel Fajemisin-Duncan and Marlon Smith: ‘we want to tell our version of south London like that one day’ (influenced by ‘Storm Damage’ that they watched growing up) – They wanted to illustrate Brixton in an honest and truthful way, from their own point of view. Stereotyping was based on what they grew up seeing (shorthand narrative – Medhurst)
·         James: “Before I’d even read the script I’d said yes. It was set in the neighbourhood that I grew up in and it was an opportunity to come home and work with guys who were from my neck of the woods.”
·         The power of Richard’s story elicits a heart-breaking performance from James who says he has always been drawn to characters “who dance among the ambiguity and the grey areas”.
·         To prepare for the role, he walked around Brixton in costume, shuffling through rush-hour streets like a ghost.  “As an acting technique that’s not something that generally works for me,” says James. “
·         But James was keen for scenes in which Richard could stand tall. “I wanted to find moments that could show not just the fallen man, but who he used to be. It was the same with Tony in Line of Duty. I never thought about him as a corrupt guy, I tried to find his motivations.” – James’ main aim was to illustrate the emotions that surround the character and to not reinforce negative stereotypes associated with the black heroin addict – this is clear through the narrative that forces an audience to empathise with ‘Richard’ in more emotional scenes.
·         James believes that British TV drama is currently on a high – “thought provoking and grown up”. 

-      Voice Online Article “C4 Give New Writers a Run” by Davina Hamilton on July 7 2013
·         To be blunt, Run is not a ‘hood’ tale, nor is it a drama about ‘man on road’, or any variation of the type of racially stereotypical story that the masses might expect a young, black, male writer to produce – particularly following on from the huge success of Channel 4’s hit urban drama Top Boy.
·         On the contrary the writers say they weren’t trying to recreate Top Boy, although some people thought they would do just that.
·         “We knew from the beginning that we didn’t want to overlap with Top Boy and we were aware that being young black men, there might have been the assumption that we were going to create a drama like that,” says Fajemisin-Duncan, who is of Nigerian, Jamaican and Irish descent. – avoiding stereotyping and discrimination towards ethnic minorities when using intense themes.
·         “In creating the drama, we looked for universal themes; collective things that we all share. That allowed us to get around the problem of falling into stereotypes.” – content
·         Aware of the negative side of racial stereotyping, the duo says they are mindful of being labelled as ‘black filmmakers’. However, they also acknowledge the potential positive impacts of being defined by race. – would the illustration of the characters been different if it was a white director?  Compare to representation of black drug dealer in ‘TopBoy’ by white director Yann Demange.


-      Time Out London Article “From Market to Mural: touring Brixton with the creators of Run”, by Gabriel Tate on July 12 2013


·         Daniel Fajemisin-Duncan lived here (Brixton) as a child and the characters were inspired by those that he grew up seeing. 


·         ‘This is one of the last examples of old-school Brixton,’ says Smith.
·         ‘People thought [the drinkers] might be dangerous, but they’re only a danger to themselves. A lot of them said there was always someone at the back of their minds, a family member or something, driving them on to get better.’  - They hoped to convey this idea through Richard’s story line involving his family. It’s a story the pair use to powerful effect in the show, as alcoholic and former crack addict Richard (Lennie James) makes a desperate bid to persuade his estranged daughter that he’s reformed.


Critical Reception:

·         Wikipedia shows that the reception of the third episode ‘Richard’ of (1.39 million UK views), which was higher than the final episode of ‘Katrina’ (1.11 million UK views).


Channel 4 Clips (clips provided by to introduce character ‘s profiles/story)

“S1-Ep3: Hope”

·         The clip establishes the stereotypical challenges within a lone parent, ethnic minority family. The scene consists of close ups which allow an audience to embody the character’s emotions and meet him prior to watching the series.

“S1-Ep3: Old Haunts”

·         Harsh brutal comments that drug addicts may have to face - "Dealer: Do you want a line?/ Richard: I'm alright thanks./ Dealer: Oh okay. You'll get hungry soon.". Specifically, the use of "you'll get hungry" establishes a strong sense of animalistic imagery personifying the recovering drug addict.

Books in relation to the topic:

-      Brave New World, 1932 by Aldous Huxley, British writer and philosopher. - Health system in America

Use this text and evidence from ‘Telegraph Article in November 2013 under the politics section by Brendan O’Neill who is the editor of the online magazine’ where he addresses the fact that the novel (Brave New World) may have got some things “terrifyingly right”, in regards to drugging the populace.

The story is about the idea of the government controlling the populance in 2540 (set in London) through a drug which is only meant to enhance their positive emotions – no come downs in real life or through "All the advantages of Christianity and alcohol; none of their defects."(Chapter 3, Page 218, paragraph 26). “You do look glum! What you need is a gramme of soma”.

The article establishes the narrative in Brave New World and how the drug ‘Soma’ subdues all “malice and bad tempers”. Additionally, O’Neill suggests that “Modern society uses antidepressants in a disturbingly similar way. A British psychiatrist is worried that antidepressants are being dished out not to combat serious depression but merely to “get rid of unhappiness”. As in Brave New World, we prefer to supress “malice and bad tempers” with drugs rather than ask what travails might lie behind such emotions and how they might be addressed.” – Similarity in both the text “Requiem for a Dream” – behaviour demonstrated when patient Sara was neglected by the doctors and prescribed to more tablets.

-      Crack in America: Demon Drugs and Social Justice, 1997 by Craig Reinaram. – Drugs and Race

The novel focuses on crack cocaine. It offers a new understanding of both the drug addiction and prohibition. It shows how crack use arose in the face of growing unemployment, racism and shrinking social services (America). Written by a team of drug researchers, the text explores the different impacts on white, blacks, the middle class and the poor. It also discusses how the media and politicians generated the crack scare as the centrepiece of the War on Drugs: Moral Panic.

KQ: “In 1989, American politicians and the news media began an extraordinary frenzy that ran until 1992. Newspapers, magazines and television networks regularly carried lurid stories about the new “epidemic” and “plague” of drug use, especially crack cocaine.” –

The media was injecting (Hypodermic needle model) into passive audiences, resulting in Moral Panic (Cohen). A noteworthy point is that prior to this, ‘Scarface, 1984’ was released based around ethnic minority ‘Tony Montana’ from Columbia, and was painted as a drug related criminal – moral panic in America towards Mexicans and Columbians – through films such as this. Those who were associated with the drug “Crack appeared in late 1984, primarily in impoverished African-American and Latino inner city neighbourhoods”. – page 2


Online research (Historical Text):

-      Miami Vice, Sex and Drugs and Rock & Roll in the TV Market by ONC Wang in February 1988 (from Jumpcut) 


·         For the last two decades U.S. recreational drug culture could prove its difference from the rest of society by pointing to the mass media's laughable misrepresentation of drug use.
·         For the first time on primetime TV, the signs of drug consumption are actually those of the drug culture, where MIAMI VICE's drug discourse coincides to a large degree with the same stylistic and imagistic vocabulary — e.g., coke mirrors, rock & roll, and MTV pyrotechnics — used by the drug culture to define itself.
·         Miami Vice circulates mainly around the “language of cocaine” – “thematically the cocaine smugglers outnumber both heroin and pot dealers on the show” and “the  stylistic dynamics are more complex” for the users of the drug shown through “the mirror, fast cars, sleek visual style, beautiful dazed models”.
·         “Cocaine and wealth speak the same language as cocaine remains the drug one can spend the most money on in the shortest period of time.” – Evidence for the ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ – protagonist lifestyle and relation to drugs - compare to MV
·         “Heroin becomes too debilitating, antisocial, and is much more class restricted” – behaviour of Richard is symbolised as antisocial, self-harm almost. The author adds “one cannot be "laid back" in the "fast lane."” – Differing lifestyles lead to different drugs – when comparing ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ with ‘Run: Richard’
·         ‘Cocaine’ is described as the idealistic drug, the “rich” drug thus the associations with it in films are hardly with ethnic minorities and the working class or lower demographics, as the drug is utilised by those who are sustaining the income it requires. – (‘Wolf of Wall Street’, white male, in touch with cocaine and his life gets better. ‘Scarface’ – ethnic minority, in touch with cocaine, life gets better and then worse, he dies. Different representations depending ones ethnicity)
·         Description of Cocaine in comparison with others: “Much more glamorous (in a bourgeois sense) than pot, heroin, or acid, coke transforms people into the most romantic drug outlaws possible.”
·         The author finalises: “one overtly unfortunate consequence of MIAMI VICE's infatuation with the drug discourse is its labelling of the drug smugglers by race. This labelling reflects how the drug culture itself names drugs by their area of origin — Jamaican, Colombian, or Humboldt, for example.”
·         Specifically associating race with the drugs: “ The show associated each group with a drug lifestyle: the Colombians with cocaine, the Jamaicans with reggae and marijuana, and the Haitians with voodoo and hallucinogens.”
·         Race and Drugs in America: “The obvious, racist implications of these associations are especially malign when one considers the United States' present foreign policy towards those Latin American states south of Miami's border.”




Academic Books:

TV Documentaries:

Internet Links:

-      The Guardian’s  Article “Black people twice as likely to be charged with drugs possession – report” by Peter Walker, 21st August 2013


·         “Black people are not just significantly more likely to be searched by police for drugs than their white peers, but face almost double the chance of being charged”
·         The study showed: “disparities for cocaine possession in London, with 78% of black people charged, compared with 44% of white people.”
Do programmes such as ‘Run’ and ‘TopBoy’ who are dominated around black males and their relation to drugs, thus reiterate into the mass populace that black people are more associated with drugs than whites? – Moral Panic, Marxists would argue that the bourgeois are associated negative societal values upon a specific ethnic group


-      The London School of Economics and Politics, news and media section - “Ethnic minorities targeted in ‘stop and search’ drug policing” by Naimh Eastwood and Micheal Shiner, 22nd August 2013


·         “Black and Asian people are being disproportionally targeted”
·         “Black people are stopped 6 times the rate as white people”
Wider social context in the UK


-       Brookings Institution “How the War on Drugs damages Black social mobility” by Jonathan Rothwell, 30th September 2014


·         “The social mobility of black Americans has suffered collateral damage from the ‘War on Drugs’. Being convicted of a crime has devastating effects”
·         “Imprisoning one in three black men”
Similarly in both the UK and US there is frenzy placed upon black people and their relation with drugs. Through drug related films such as ‘Run’, it illustrates how the UK aren’t afraid to highlight the negative drug associations with ethnic minorities, but is it the face that black people are hardly associated with drugs in US films that emphasises the overall problem – (the things that aren’t shown stand out as much as the things that are) – American drug related films tend to be positive, outgoing “the American dream”, by using a leading black male – who, in modern culture they associate with negativity and crime – wouldn’t allow this same concept to be fulfilled.


-      We are the Drug Policy Alliance “Race and Drug War”, under the issues section.



·         “drug war has produced profoundly unequal outcomes across racial groups, manifested through racial discrimination by law enforcement and disproportionate drug war misery suffered by communities of colour”
Specific ethnic groups are faced with discrimination due to the drug war, as reiterated through negative portrayals of black males in films such as British social realistic films such as ‘Ill Manors’ and ‘TopBoy’ 

No comments:

Post a Comment